Where Cutting-Edge
Criminal Defense
Meets Texas Justice

Bryan Juvenile Crime Defense Attorneys

Juvenile crimes in Texas encompass a range of offenses committed by individuals younger than 18, often resulting from various factors such as peer pressure, family dynamics, or socioeconomic circumstances. From underage drinking and theft to vandalism and drug possession, these charges can have profound implications for a child’s future. In the face of such challenges, the importance of retaining an experienced Bryan juvenile criminal defense lawyer cannot be overstated.

A criminal charge, even at a young age, can tarnish a juvenile’s record and hinder their educational and employment opportunities down the line. Additionally, it can strain familial relationships and lead to emotional distress for both the child and their loved ones.

Bryan Juvenile Crime Guide

Why Choose the Law Office of Shane Phelps for Your Bryan Juvenile Crime Defense Lawyer?

home-split-

With the guidance of a knowledgeable attorney focusing on juvenile defense, families can navigate the complexities of the legal system and work toward mitigating the consequences of the charges. From advocating for alternative resolutions to protecting the child’s rights throughout the legal process, a skilled lawyer can provide invaluable support.

Your lawyer will work to ensure that the juvenile receives fair treatment and the opportunity for rehabilitation rather than enduring the lifelong stigma of a criminal conviction.

At Shane Phelps Law, our Bryan juvenile criminal defense lawyers have the skill and decades of experience to help you. We care about you and your family and will do whatever we can to make sure your child does not have to live with the negative impacts of a criminal conviction. Call us today at 979-596-6843 for a free consultation and let us put our experience to work for you.

Our Law Office in Bryan, Texas

The Law Office of Shane Phelps, P.C., is located at 400 N. Washington Avenue, Bryan, TX 77803. We are in the heart of Bryan, at the corner of E. 23rd Street. Contact us for a free consultation.

Types of Juvenile Crimes

Juvenile-Laws-in-Texas

Common types of juvenile crimes in Bryan, Texas, include:

  • Underage Drinking: This involves minors consuming alcohol, possessing alcohol, or attempting to purchase alcohol illegally.
  • Theft: Juveniles may be charged with theft for stealing items from stores, vehicles, or other individuals.
  • Trespassing: This offense occurs when a minor unlawfully enters or remains on someone else’s property without permission.
  • Robbery: Juvenile robbery involves the use of force, intimidation, or threat to steal property from another person.
  • Fighting: Altercations between juveniles, whether physical or verbal, can lead to charges of assaultbattery, or disorderly conduct.
  • Drug Possession: Possession of illegal substances such as marijuana, cocaine, or prescription drugs without a valid prescription can result in juvenile drug charges.
  • Vandalism: Juveniles may face charges for intentionally damaging or defacing property belonging to others.
  • Burglary: This involves unlawfully entering a building or structure with the intent to commit theft, vandalism, or another crime.

These are just a few examples, and there are many other offenses that juveniles may be charged with in Texas. Parents and guardians need to seek legal representation promptly if their child is facing accusations of juvenile delinquency to protect their rights and future.

Juvenile Crime and the Texas Justice System

AV-Preeminent

In Texas, when a child reaches the age of 10 years old, they become accountable for offenses they commit through the Texas Juvenile Justice Department, governed by the Texas Family Code. Unlike the adult system, the juvenile justice system operates with a distinct philosophical emphasis and approach to punishment.

Rather than labeling juvenile offenders as “criminals,” the system recognizes them as individuals who “engage in delinquent conduct” and who may be “in need of supervision.” This framework is rooted in the belief that young individuals are still developing emotionally and mentally. They should be afforded opportunities for rehabilitation and redirection.

As such, the focus of the juvenile system is not solely punitive but also aims to address underlying issues and provide support for positive behavioral change.

When a child is involved in a juvenile offense, the handling of the case differs significantly from adult criminal proceedings. Instead of facing trial by jury for a verdict of guilty or not guilty, juvenile cases are typically heard by judges who determine the outcome based on the evidence presented.

Consequences for Juvenile Offenses

top-100

For less serious offenses or first-time offenders, the consequences could include community service, probation, restitution to victims, or participation in diversion programs aimed at addressing underlying issues such as substance abuse or behavioral problems.

However, for more serious offenses or repeat offenders, the consequences can be more severe. These may include placement in juvenile detention facilities, such as the Texas Youth Commission, which serves as a correctional institution for juveniles.

In rare cases involving particularly egregious offenses or older juveniles, there is the possibility of being certified to stand trial as an adult. If convicted as an adult, the juvenile could face adult punishments, including incarceration in state prison.

Potential Long-Term Consequences of Juvenile Crime Convictions

A juvenile conviction can have profound and lasting consequences that extend far beyond the immediate legal penalties imposed by the court. One of the most significant long-term impacts is the potential hindrance to the juvenile’s future opportunities, particularly in terms of employment and housing.

Employment

With a criminal record, even one acquired during adolescence, individuals often face significant challenges when seeking employment. Many employers conduct background checks as part of their hiring process, and a juvenile conviction may result in automatic disqualification or raise concerns about the applicant’s reliability and trustworthiness.

Additionally, certain professions and occupations may have legal or regulatory restrictions that prohibit individuals with criminal records from obtaining licensure or certification.

Housing

Securing stable housing can become increasingly difficult for individuals with a juvenile record. Landlords and property management companies commonly perform background checks on prospective tenants, and a criminal conviction may lead to denial of housing applications or limited housing options. This can exacerbate issues of housing instability and homelessness, further complicating a person’s ability to reintegrate into society and establish a stable, productive life.

Education

Some educational institutions may require disclosure of criminal history during the admissions process, potentially affecting acceptance decisions or eligibility for scholarships and financial aid.

The long-term consequences of a juvenile conviction underscore the critical importance of effective advocacy to mitigate the impact on the juvenile’s prospects. An experienced Byran juvenile crime defense attorney can guide juveniles and their families through the post-conviction landscape and work toward rebuilding their lives.

Advocating for Alternative Resolutions for Juvenile Crimes

home-split

Alternative resolutions to juvenile cases, such as diversion programs or community service, offer valuable opportunities for rehabilitation and accountability outside of traditional courtroom proceedings. These programs aim to address the underlying causes of juvenile delinquency, promote positive behavioral change, and prevent further involvement in the criminal justice system.

Diversion programs may involve counseling, educational workshops, or restorative justice practices designed to help juveniles understand the impact of their actions and take responsibility for their behavior. Community service allows juveniles to contribute positively while fulfilling their obligations to society.

An experienced attorney who focuses on juvenile defense plays a crucial role in advocating for these alternative resolutions on behalf of their clients.

Parental Rights and Responsibilities in Bryan Juvenile Crime Cases

ClientChampion_Platinum

In juvenile crime cases, parents play a crucial role in advocating for their child’s best interests and ensuring that their rights are protected throughout the legal process. As such, parents need to be informed about their rights and responsibilities from the moment their child becomes involved in the juvenile justice system.

First and foremost, parents have the right to be involved in their child’s case and to be kept informed about all legal proceedings and decisions. This includes the right to attend court hearings, review court documents, and participate in meetings with legal counsel and juvenile justice professionals. Additionally, parents have the right to provide input and make decisions regarding their child’s defense strategy, including whether to accept plea deals or pursue alternative resolutions.

Parents also have a responsibility to support and advocate for their children throughout the legal process. This may involve providing emotional support and guidance, helping their child understand their rights and obligations, and making communication between their child and their lawyer easier.

Additionally, parents can help address any underlying issues or challenges that may have contributed to their child’s involvement in delinquent behavior, such as substance abuse or mental health issues.

Working closely with their child’s attorney helps ensure that their child receives fair treatment and the best possible outcome in their case. Parents can help mitigate the negative consequences of juvenile involvement in the criminal justice system and support their child’s successful rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

Supporting Juvenile Mental Health Issues in Criminal Cases

top-100

Many juveniles involved in the criminal justice system may be struggling with mental health issues such as depression, anxiety, ADHD, or substance abuse issues. These underlying issues can significantly impact their behavior and decision-making, potentially leading to involvement in delinquent activities.

By collaborating with mental health experts, attorneys can develop comprehensive defense strategies that take into account the child’s mental health needs. They can advocate for alternative resolutions that prioritize rehabilitation and treatment over punishment.

A skilled juvenile crime defense attorney can help ensure that the child’s mental health needs are considered by the court and integrated into the overall legal proceedings. They can advocate for outcomes that address these needs while holding the child accountable for their actions.

Contact Bryan, Texas, Lawyers at the Law Office of Shane Phelps

If your child is facing allegations of juvenile delinquency, it’s crucial to seek experienced legal representation to protect their rights and future. The Law Offices of Shane Phelps in Bryan, Texas, understands the complexities of juvenile criminal defense and provides compassionate and effective advocacy for families navigating the juvenile justice system.

Led by attorney Shane Phelps, a Board-Certified Criminal Defense Specialist with a proven record of success, our team is committed to securing the best possible outcome for your child. We prioritize personalized attention for each client, taking the time to understand your unique circumstances and develop tailored defense strategies that address your specific needs and goals.

When you choose the Law Offices of Shane Phelps, you can trust that you’re getting dedicated and knowledgeable legal representation that puts your child’s best interests first. Don’t wait to seek help – contact our Bryan criminal defense lawyers today and start protecting your child’s future. Call Shane Phelps Law today at 979-596-6843 or contact us online to schedule a free consultation.

Shane Phelps

Shane Phelps

Lead Attorney

Reilly Garrett

Reilly Garrett

Attorney

Aaron Kleinschmidt

Aaron Kleinschmidt

Attorney

Case Results

How We’ve Helped Others In Your Shoes

Appellate Reversal and Dismissal

Murder x 2

State v. D.L.
2019

Sexual Assault

Dismissed

Wilson County v. T.M.
2024

Harassment

Dismissed

State v. D.C.
2022

Title IX

Accusation of Sexual Assault

Not responsible
State v. Z.M.
2023

Dismissed with Agreement to Immediately Expunge (on day of trial)

Attempted Theft $2,500-$30,000

Attempted Securing Execution of a Document by Deception
State v. G.M.
2023

Sexual Assault

Rejected after our investigation

Sexual Assault
Rejected after our investigation
State v. Z.M.
2023

Refused After Our Investigation

Prostitution (Class B)

Refused after our investigation 2014 (State v. I.I.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 3, less than 28 grams (Class A), Possession of Marijuana, less than two ounces (Class B) – Both reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudications, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. D.O.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 2, less than one gram (State Jail Felony) – Reduced to misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2014, early termination of probation 2015 (State v. P.B.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Criminal Mischief $500-$1500 (Class A)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. I.S.)

Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 1, less than one gram (State Jail Felony) – Dismissed 2014 (State v. L.P.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 2, 4-400 Grams (2nd Degree); Three counts Misdemeanor controlled substance charges – Refused following our investigation; three misdemeanor charges to be dismissed. 2015 (State v. J.D.)

Dismissed

Possession of Marijuana

2-4 Ounces, Drug Free Zone (State Jail Felony) – Dismissed 2015 (State v. S.A.)

Negotiated pre-trial diversion on Class B

Possession of Marijuana

2-4 Ounces, Drug Free Zone (State Jail Felony) – Negotiated pre-trial diversion on Class B misdemeanor, seized vehicle and more than $15,000 recovered for client 2015 (State v. C.M.)

Dismissed

Possession of Child Pornography (Two Counts; 3rd Degree)

(Two Counts; 3 rd Degree) – Both counts Dismissed, no sex offender registration 2015 (State v. B.M.)

Dismissed

Failure to Identify (Class B)

Dismissed, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. L.W.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication

Theft $1,500-$20,000 (State Jail Felony)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2014 (State v. K.J.)

Refused

Possession of False ID

Possession of False ID (Class A)/Minor in Possession (Class C) – Class A Refused and MIP Dismissed 2015 (State v. B.B.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Furnishing Alcohol to a Minor (Class A)

Refused following our investigation 2015 (State v. M.G.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Manufacture/Delivery of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 1A, 4-400 Grams (1st Degree) – Refused following our investigation 2015 (State v. R.A.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Tampering with Evidence (3rd Degree)

Refused following our investigation 2015

No Billed by Grand Jury

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/Bottle (2nd Degree)

No Billed by Grand Jury following our investigation 2014 (State v. G.H.)

Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Possession with Intent to Deliver a Controlled Substance: Dismissed

Dismissed

Assault by Contact (Class C)

Dismissed 2014 (State v. A.M.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 2, less than one gram (State Jail Felony) – Reduced to misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2014 (State v. D.D.)

D.W.I Refused, POM Reduced

D.W.I (Class B); Possession of Marijuana

D.W.I (Class B); Possession of Marijuana under two ounces (Class B) – D.W.I refused, POM reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication 2014 (State v. P.D.G.)

Dismissed

Assault on Peace Officer (3rd Degree)

Harassment of a Public Servant (3rd Degree) – Dismissed 2014 (State v. A.Y.)

Dismissed

Theft $20,000-$100,000 (3rd Degree)

Dismissed 2015 (State v. C.S.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Possession of Marijuana

Possession of Marijuana under two ounces (Class B) – Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, expunction eligible 2015 (State v. S.P.)

All Charges Refused

Aggravated Kidnapping (1st Degree)

Aggravated Kidnapping (1st Degree), Sexual Assault of a Child (2nd Degree), Improper Visual Photography (State Jail Felony) – All charges refused after our investigation 2014 (State v. Z.H.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Tampering with Evidence (3rd Degree)

Refused after our investigation 2014 (State v. O.S.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 2, 4-400 grams (2nd Degree) – Refused after our investigation 2014 (State v. D.B.L.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Criminal Trespass to a Habitation (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication 2013 (State v. J.K.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Altered Handicapped Placard (Class A)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, expunged 2013 (State v. L.W.)

All Charges Dismissed

D.W.I. (Class B)

D.W.I. (Class B), Unlawfully Carrying a Weapon (four counts, Class A), Possession of Marijuana under two ounces (class B), Possession of a Dangerous Drug (Class A) – All charges dismissed except POM deferred adjudication with agreement for expunction; all weapons recovered for client. 2013 (State v. K.Y.)

Case Dismissed

Criminal Trespass – Property

Criminal Trespass – Property

Both Charges Dismissed

2 Counts of Aggravated Assault

2 Counts of Aggravated Assault

Motion to Adjudicate Dismissed

Motion to Adjudicate on Possession of Marijuana 4oz. – 5 lbs

Motion to Adjudicate on Possession of Marijuana 4oz. – 5 lbs

Evidence Suppressed

Murder/Aggravated, Robbery/Prohibited Weapon
State v. S.S.
2022

Refused After Our Investigation

Theft (State Jail Felony)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. S.K.)

Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor

Theft $50-$500 (Class B)

Theft $50-$500 (Class B) – Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. P.C.)

Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor

Criminal Trespass to Habitation (Class A)

Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication (Pending expunction) (State v. W.A.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor

Burglary of a Habitation (2nd Degree)

Reduced to Misdemeanor 2014 (State v. P.M.)

Dismissed

Motion to Adjudicate/Burglary of a Building (State Jail Felony)

Dismissed 2015 (State v. B.R.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/knife (2nd Degree)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. P.M.)

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/knife (2nd Degree)

Dismissed 2013 (State v. M.N.)

Dismissed

Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child (1st Degree)

Dismissed 2014 (State v. C.L.)

Not Guilty by Jury

Indecency w/Child by Contact (2nd Degree)

Not Guilty by jury 2013 (State v. J.Z.)

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault/Deadly Weapon/Peace Officer

Dismissed 2015 (State v. A.H.)

Negotiated Deferred Prosecution on lesser charge

Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child/Juvenile

Negotiated Deferred Prosecution on lesser charge, no sex offender registration 2015 (In the Matter of R.C.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Sexual Assault (2nd Degree)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. T.G.)

Dismissed at Trial

Aggravated Robbery (1st Degree)

Dismissed at trial 2015 (State v. J.M.)

Dismissed at Trial

Assault/Family Violence (Class A)

Dismissed at trial 2015 (State v. N.G.)

Acquitted

Indecency with a Child

Acquitted by jury

Acquitted

Indecency with a Child

Acquitted by jury

Quashed and Dismissed

Fleeing a Police Officer

Quashed and dismissed

Reduced

Driving While License Suspended

Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor deferred

Sentence Reversed

Possession of a Firearm by a Felon

15-year sentence reversed on Motion for New Trial

Refused After Our Investigation

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/firearm (2nd Degree)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. G.B.)

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon (2nd Degree)

Dismissed 2015 (State v. S.M.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Theft $50-$500 (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. M.D.)

Negotiated Misdemeanor Pre-Trial Diversion

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 1, less than a gram, Drug Free Zone (3rd Degree); Possession of Marijuana under two ounces, Drug Free Zone (Class A) – Negotiated misdemeanor pre-trial diversion with agreement for expunction 2015 (State v. L.L.)

Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance, Penalty Group 2, less than a gram (State Jail Felony)

Penalty Group 2, less than a gram (State Jail Felony) – Dismissed 2015 (State v. C.F.)

Reduced to non-aggravated Manslaughter charge

Murder (1st Degree)

Reduced to non-aggravated Manslaughter charge (2nd Degree), 8 years 2014 (State v. B.S.)

Dismissed

Burglary of a Vehicle (Class A)

Dismissed 2015 (State v. R.R.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Possession of Marijuana (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. J.H.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Unlawfully Carrying a Weapon (Class A)

Refused after our investigation; arrest expunged 2015 (State v. G.S.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Possession of Marijuana (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. B.C.)

Refused after our investigation

Assault/Family Violence (Class A)

Assault/Family Violence (Class A) – Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. V.K.)

Dismissed

Sexual Assault of a Child (2nd Degree)

Sexual Assault of a Child (2nd Degree) – Dismissed at trial 2015 (State v. J.J.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Theft $50-$500 (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, Expunction pending 2015 (State v. A.B.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Criminal Mischief $1,500 – $20,000 (State Jail Felony)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. J.W.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Assault/Family Violence (Class A)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. D.K.) Expunged 2015.

Reduced to Class C

Theft $50-$500 (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. R.R.) (Pending Expunction)

Reduced to Class A Misdemeanor Assault

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/Bottle (2nd Degree)

Reduced to Class A Misdemeanor Assault 2015 (State v. C.F.)

Refused after our investigation

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/handgun (2nd Degree)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. W.M.)

Not Guilty Verdict

Not Guilty Verdict

Aggravated Robbery/Murder x2
2023
State v. M.R.

Found Not True

Motion to Adjudicate/Felony Assault Family Violence (3rd Degree)

Found Not True by Court after contested hearing 2013 (State v. R.R.)

Not Guilty Verdict

Not Guilty Verdict

Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon
2023
State v. T.H.

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault

Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Brazos County
State v. J.M.

Dismissed

Evading Arrest with a Vehicle (3rd Degree)

State v. J.E.
Evading Arrest with a Vehicle (3rd Degree)
Dismissed
Milam County

What You Need to Know

Shane’s Top Ten Rules

Avoid Trouble at A&M, Blinn, & Beyond
top-10