Where Cutting-Edge
Criminal Defense
Meets Texas Justice

Bryan Drug Crimes Attorneys

Facing drug crime charges in Texas can be a daunting experience, stirring up feelings of fear and uncertainty. When accused of drug-related offenses, individuals often find themselves grappling with the weight of serious consequences that could impact their future. A skilled Bryan, Texas drug crime lawyer can provide the clarity and advocacy needed to navigate the complexities of the legal system and work toward the best possible outcome.

Whether it’s a charge of drug possession, distribution, or trafficking, the legal process can seem overwhelming and confusing. In times like these, having the right support and guidance is crucial. At the Law Office of Shane Phelps, P.C., we understand the challenges and anxieties that come with facing drug crime charges. Our team is here to offer compassionate assistance and unwavering support to individuals in need.

We believe that everyone deserves a fair chance at justice and are dedicated to providing personalized legal representation tailored to your unique circumstances. With our knowledge of Texas drug laws, we strive to alleviate the burdens you’re carrying and help you move forward with confidence. If you or a loved one is facing drug crime charges in Bryan, don’t face it alone – let us stand by your side and fight for your rights.

 

Bryan Drug Crime Guide

Why Choose the Law Office of Shane Phelps as Your Bryan, Texas Drug Crime Lawyer?

home-split

When it comes to selecting a legal team to represent you in Bryan, Texas drug crime cases, choosing the Law Office of Shane Phelps offers the advantage of local lawyers deeply familiar with the intricacies of Texas laws and regulations. Our attorneys have extensive experience navigating the Texas legal system, including its specific statutes and precedents related to drug offenses. By working with a team that understands the nuances of Texas law, you can trust that your case will be handled with precision and effectiveness.

Our track record of success speaks for itself. With a history of favorable outcomes and satisfied clients, our firm has earned a reputation for excellence in the field of criminal defense. We prioritize each client’s individual needs and circumstances, providing dedicated representation and personalized attention throughout every stage of the legal process. By choosing our firm, you can feel confident knowing you have a committed team of legal professionals fighting tirelessly on your behalf.

Our Office in Bryan, Texas

The Law Office of Shane Phelps, P.C., is located at 400 N. Washington Avenue, Bryan, TX 77803. We are in the heart of Bryan, at the corner of E. 23rd Street. Contact us for a free consultation.

Understanding Drug Crimes in Texas

Drug-Crimes

 

Understanding drug crimes in Texas requires familiarity with the various offenses outlined under state law and the corresponding legal consequences. Common drug offenses in Texas outlined in the Texas Controlled Substances Act include possessiontrafficking, distribution, and manufacturing of controlled substances.

Possession involves being found with illegal drugs, while trafficking and distribution involve the sale or transportation of controlled substances. Manufacturing refers to the production or cultivation of illicit drugs.

Each offense carries different penalties, depending on factors such as the type and amount of drugs involved, prior criminal history, and the presence of aggravating circumstances.

The legal consequences for drug crimes in Texas can be severe. Possession of controlled substances, even in small amounts, can result in fines, probation, and jail time. Trafficking and distribution offenses typically carry harsher penalties, including lengthy prison sentences and substantial fines.

Additionally, individuals convicted of drug crimes may face collateral consequences such as loss of employment opportunities, professional licenses, and immigration status.

Classification of Controlled Substances under Texas Law

Texas law classifies controlled substances into different penalty groups based on their potential for abuse and medical use. The classification system, ranging from Penalty Group 1 to Penalty Group 4, dictates the severity of penalties for drug offenses.

Offenses involving substances in Penalty Group 1, such as cocaine and heroin, generally result in more severe penalties compared to those involving substances in Penalty Group 4, such as prescription medications with a lower potential for abuse.

Understanding the classification of controlled substances is crucial for assessing the potential legal consequences and crafting an effective defense strategy in drug crime cases in Texas.

This is not something you have to figure out on your own. An experienced drug crime lawyer from the Law Office of Shane Phelps can be your advocate. Our attorneys are locally based in Bryan and well-versed in Texas laws that apply to drug crime charges.

best-attorney

 

Navigating the legal process for Bryan drug crime cases can be complex, but understanding each step can help individuals facing charges feel more empowered. It typically begins with an arrest by law enforcement officers who suspect the individual of committing a drug-related offense.

Following the arrest, the accused is brought before a judge for an initial appearance, known as arraignment. During arraignment, the charges are formally presented, and the accused may enter a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest.

As the case progresses, various key players come into play. Law enforcement officers gather evidence and witness statements to build a case, while prosecutors analyze the evidence and decide whether to pursue charges. Judges oversee pretrial proceedings, including bail hearings and motions, and preside over the trial if the case goes to court.

Defense attorneys play a critical role in advocating for the accused, conducting their own investigations, negotiating with prosecutors, and representing their clients in court. Building a strong defense strategy early in the process can maximize the chances of a favorable outcome. This may involve challenging the legality of the arrest, questioning the admissibility of evidence, or seeking alternative resolutions such as plea bargains.

By proactively addressing legal issues and building a robust defense, individuals accused of drug crimes can better protect their rights and interests throughout the legal process in Texas. It’s important to contact an experienced Bryan, Texas, drug crime attorney as soon as possible if you are facing charges.

Examples of Challenges and Defenses in Drug Crime Cases

avvo

 

In drug crime cases, individuals often encounter lots of challenges that can significantly impact their defense strategies and legal outcomes. Examples include:

  • Illegal search and seizure
  • Lack of sufficient evidence
  • Entrapment by law enforcement

Illegal search and seizure is where law enforcement officers may have violated constitutional rights. Entrapment is where individuals are induced or coerced into committing a crime by law enforcement, which can complicate matters and raise questions about the validity of the charges.

To effectively combat drug crime charges, a range of defense strategies can be employed. These may include:

  • Suppression motions to exclude unlawfully obtained evidence
  • Plea negotiations for reduced charges or sentences
  • Trial tactics including attacking witness credibility and presenting affirmative defenses

By strategically utilizing these and other defense strategies, individuals charged with drug crimes can work toward achieving favorable outcomes and protecting their rights in the legal process.

For example, a case where evidence obtained through an illegal search is successfully suppressed, leading to the dismissal of charges, demonstrates the importance of challenging constitutional violations. Similarly, a hypothetical scenario where entrapment was established through compelling evidence could highlight the significance of exploring all possible defenses to protect defendants’ rights and achieve favorable outcomes in drug crime cases.

By understanding the challenges and available defenses, individuals charged with drug crimes can make informed decisions and effectively navigate the legal process with the guidance of experienced defense counsel.

The Role of a Texas Drug Crime Lawyer

shane-home-hero-1

 

Selecting the right attorney to handle a drug crime case is important, as experience and dedication play vital roles in achieving favorable outcomes. An attorney with a proven track record of success in defending drug crime cases brings valuable insights, knowledge, and courtroom skills to the table. Their familiarity with the intricacies of drug laws, local court procedures, and effective defense strategies can make a significant difference in the outcome of a case. A seasoned drug crime defense lawyer can help with:

  • Providing legal guidance and representation to individuals accused of drug offenses throughout the legal process.
  • Conducting thorough investigations to gather evidence, assess the strength of the prosecution’s case, and identify potential defense strategies.
  • Advising clients on their rights, potential consequences, and available options for resolving their cases.
  • Negotiating with prosecutors to seek favorable plea bargains or alternative resolutions.
  • Representing clients in court proceedings, including arraignments, pretrial hearings, and trials.
  • Advocating vigorously for clients’ rights and interests, challenging evidence, cross-examining witnesses, and presenting compelling arguments in court.

Hiring a Bryan criminal defense lawyer with experience handling drug crime cases, like Shane Phelps, offers distinct advantages. Our legal team has focused training and certification in criminal law. We adhere to stringent standards of professionalism and ethical conduct, providing our clients with confidence and assurance in their legal representation. With our office located centrally in Bryan, Texas, our lawyers are part of your community. You can trust in receiving personalized, effective, and steadfast advocacy throughout your legal proceedings.

Contact the Law Office of Shane Phelps for Help with Drug Crime Charges

Our Bryan, Texas, team is led by a former prosecutor who is well aware of the various ways in which prosecutors approach drug crime cases. We can use this knowledge to prepare a strong defense strategy on your behalf and represent you in negotiations or at trial.

Our founder, Shane Phelps, is a Board-Certified Criminal Law Specialist by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. This means we offer skilled representation at all times. You can have peace of mind knowing your rights, future, and freedom are in good hands. Get the customized defense you deserve. Schedule a free case review by calling 979-596-6843 today or contact us online.

Shane Phelps

Shane Phelps

Lead Attorney

Reilly Garrett

Reilly Garrett

Attorney

Aaron Kleinschmidt

Aaron Kleinschmidt

Attorney

Case Results

How We’ve Helped Others In Your Shoes

Appellate Reversal and Dismissal

Murder x 2

State v. D.L.
2019

Sexual Assault

Dismissed

Wilson County v. T.M.
2024

Harassment

Dismissed

State v. D.C.
2022

Title IX

Accusation of Sexual Assault

Not responsible
State v. Z.M.
2023

Dismissed with Agreement to Immediately Expunge (on day of trial)

Attempted Theft $2,500-$30,000

Attempted Securing Execution of a Document by Deception
State v. G.M.
2023

Sexual Assault

Rejected after our investigation

Sexual Assault
Rejected after our investigation
State v. Z.M.
2023

Refused After Our Investigation

Prostitution (Class B)

Refused after our investigation 2014 (State v. I.I.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 3, less than 28 grams (Class A), Possession of Marijuana, less than two ounces (Class B) – Both reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudications, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. D.O.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 2, less than one gram (State Jail Felony) – Reduced to misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2014, early termination of probation 2015 (State v. P.B.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Criminal Mischief $500-$1500 (Class A)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. I.S.)

Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 1, less than one gram (State Jail Felony) – Dismissed 2014 (State v. L.P.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 2, 4-400 Grams (2nd Degree); Three counts Misdemeanor controlled substance charges – Refused following our investigation; three misdemeanor charges to be dismissed. 2015 (State v. J.D.)

Dismissed

Possession of Marijuana

2-4 Ounces, Drug Free Zone (State Jail Felony) – Dismissed 2015 (State v. S.A.)

Negotiated pre-trial diversion on Class B

Possession of Marijuana

2-4 Ounces, Drug Free Zone (State Jail Felony) – Negotiated pre-trial diversion on Class B misdemeanor, seized vehicle and more than $15,000 recovered for client 2015 (State v. C.M.)

Dismissed

Possession of Child Pornography (Two Counts; 3rd Degree)

(Two Counts; 3 rd Degree) – Both counts Dismissed, no sex offender registration 2015 (State v. B.M.)

Dismissed

Failure to Identify (Class B)

Dismissed, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. L.W.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication

Theft $1,500-$20,000 (State Jail Felony)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2014 (State v. K.J.)

Refused

Possession of False ID

Possession of False ID (Class A)/Minor in Possession (Class C) – Class A Refused and MIP Dismissed 2015 (State v. B.B.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Furnishing Alcohol to a Minor (Class A)

Refused following our investigation 2015 (State v. M.G.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Manufacture/Delivery of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 1A, 4-400 Grams (1st Degree) – Refused following our investigation 2015 (State v. R.A.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Tampering with Evidence (3rd Degree)

Refused following our investigation 2015

No Billed by Grand Jury

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/Bottle (2nd Degree)

No Billed by Grand Jury following our investigation 2014 (State v. G.H.)

Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Possession with Intent to Deliver a Controlled Substance: Dismissed

Dismissed

Assault by Contact (Class C)

Dismissed 2014 (State v. A.M.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 2, less than one gram (State Jail Felony) – Reduced to misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2014 (State v. D.D.)

D.W.I Refused, POM Reduced

D.W.I (Class B); Possession of Marijuana

D.W.I (Class B); Possession of Marijuana under two ounces (Class B) – D.W.I refused, POM reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication 2014 (State v. P.D.G.)

Dismissed

Assault on Peace Officer (3rd Degree)

Harassment of a Public Servant (3rd Degree) – Dismissed 2014 (State v. A.Y.)

Dismissed

Theft $20,000-$100,000 (3rd Degree)

Dismissed 2015 (State v. C.S.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Possession of Marijuana

Possession of Marijuana under two ounces (Class B) – Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, expunction eligible 2015 (State v. S.P.)

All Charges Refused

Aggravated Kidnapping (1st Degree)

Aggravated Kidnapping (1st Degree), Sexual Assault of a Child (2nd Degree), Improper Visual Photography (State Jail Felony) – All charges refused after our investigation 2014 (State v. Z.H.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Tampering with Evidence (3rd Degree)

Refused after our investigation 2014 (State v. O.S.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 2, 4-400 grams (2nd Degree) – Refused after our investigation 2014 (State v. D.B.L.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Criminal Trespass to a Habitation (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication 2013 (State v. J.K.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Altered Handicapped Placard (Class A)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, expunged 2013 (State v. L.W.)

All Charges Dismissed

D.W.I. (Class B)

D.W.I. (Class B), Unlawfully Carrying a Weapon (four counts, Class A), Possession of Marijuana under two ounces (class B), Possession of a Dangerous Drug (Class A) – All charges dismissed except POM deferred adjudication with agreement for expunction; all weapons recovered for client. 2013 (State v. K.Y.)

Case Dismissed

Criminal Trespass – Property

Criminal Trespass – Property

Both Charges Dismissed

2 Counts of Aggravated Assault

2 Counts of Aggravated Assault

Motion to Adjudicate Dismissed

Motion to Adjudicate on Possession of Marijuana 4oz. – 5 lbs

Motion to Adjudicate on Possession of Marijuana 4oz. – 5 lbs

Evidence Suppressed

Murder/Aggravated, Robbery/Prohibited Weapon
State v. S.S.
2022

Refused After Our Investigation

Theft (State Jail Felony)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. S.K.)

Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor

Theft $50-$500 (Class B)

Theft $50-$500 (Class B) – Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. P.C.)

Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor

Criminal Trespass to Habitation (Class A)

Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication (Pending expunction) (State v. W.A.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor

Burglary of a Habitation (2nd Degree)

Reduced to Misdemeanor 2014 (State v. P.M.)

Dismissed

Motion to Adjudicate/Burglary of a Building (State Jail Felony)

Dismissed 2015 (State v. B.R.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/knife (2nd Degree)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. P.M.)

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/knife (2nd Degree)

Dismissed 2013 (State v. M.N.)

Dismissed

Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child (1st Degree)

Dismissed 2014 (State v. C.L.)

Not Guilty by Jury

Indecency w/Child by Contact (2nd Degree)

Not Guilty by jury 2013 (State v. J.Z.)

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault/Deadly Weapon/Peace Officer

Dismissed 2015 (State v. A.H.)

Negotiated Deferred Prosecution on lesser charge

Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child/Juvenile

Negotiated Deferred Prosecution on lesser charge, no sex offender registration 2015 (In the Matter of R.C.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Sexual Assault (2nd Degree)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. T.G.)

Dismissed at Trial

Aggravated Robbery (1st Degree)

Dismissed at trial 2015 (State v. J.M.)

Dismissed at Trial

Assault/Family Violence (Class A)

Dismissed at trial 2015 (State v. N.G.)

Acquitted

Indecency with a Child

Acquitted by jury

Acquitted

Indecency with a Child

Acquitted by jury

Quashed and Dismissed

Fleeing a Police Officer

Quashed and dismissed

Reduced

Driving While License Suspended

Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor deferred

Sentence Reversed

Possession of a Firearm by a Felon

15-year sentence reversed on Motion for New Trial

Refused After Our Investigation

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/firearm (2nd Degree)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. G.B.)

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon (2nd Degree)

Dismissed 2015 (State v. S.M.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Theft $50-$500 (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. M.D.)

Negotiated Misdemeanor Pre-Trial Diversion

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 1, less than a gram, Drug Free Zone (3rd Degree); Possession of Marijuana under two ounces, Drug Free Zone (Class A) – Negotiated misdemeanor pre-trial diversion with agreement for expunction 2015 (State v. L.L.)

Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance, Penalty Group 2, less than a gram (State Jail Felony)

Penalty Group 2, less than a gram (State Jail Felony) – Dismissed 2015 (State v. C.F.)

Reduced to non-aggravated Manslaughter charge

Murder (1st Degree)

Reduced to non-aggravated Manslaughter charge (2nd Degree), 8 years 2014 (State v. B.S.)

Dismissed

Burglary of a Vehicle (Class A)

Dismissed 2015 (State v. R.R.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Possession of Marijuana (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. J.H.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Unlawfully Carrying a Weapon (Class A)

Refused after our investigation; arrest expunged 2015 (State v. G.S.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Possession of Marijuana (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. B.C.)

Refused after our investigation

Assault/Family Violence (Class A)

Assault/Family Violence (Class A) – Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. V.K.)

Dismissed

Sexual Assault of a Child (2nd Degree)

Sexual Assault of a Child (2nd Degree) – Dismissed at trial 2015 (State v. J.J.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Theft $50-$500 (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, Expunction pending 2015 (State v. A.B.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Criminal Mischief $1,500 – $20,000 (State Jail Felony)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. J.W.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Assault/Family Violence (Class A)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. D.K.) Expunged 2015.

Reduced to Class C

Theft $50-$500 (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. R.R.) (Pending Expunction)

Reduced to Class A Misdemeanor Assault

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/Bottle (2nd Degree)

Reduced to Class A Misdemeanor Assault 2015 (State v. C.F.)

Refused after our investigation

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/handgun (2nd Degree)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. W.M.)

Not Guilty Verdict

Not Guilty Verdict

Aggravated Robbery/Murder x2
2023
State v. M.R.

Found Not True

Motion to Adjudicate/Felony Assault Family Violence (3rd Degree)

Found Not True by Court after contested hearing 2013 (State v. R.R.)

Not Guilty Verdict

Not Guilty Verdict

Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon
2023
State v. T.H.

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault

Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Brazos County
State v. J.M.

Dismissed

Evading Arrest with a Vehicle (3rd Degree)

State v. J.E.
Evading Arrest with a Vehicle (3rd Degree)
Dismissed
Milam County

What You Need to Know

Shane’s Top Ten Rules

Avoid Trouble at A&M, Blinn, & Beyond
top-10