Where Cutting-Edge
Criminal Defense
Meets Texas Justice

Bryan Unlawful Police Stop Attorneys

Law enforcement officers in Bryan, Texas, are tasked with upholding the law and ensuring public safety. However, like all human beings, they are susceptible to errors.

Police sometimes make arrests hastily or without proper adherence to legal protocols. These lapses can result in unlawful arrests, jeopardizing your rights and undermining the integrity of the legal system.

At Shane Phelps Law, a Bryan unlawful police stop lawyer can investigate your arrest and gather evidence that shows the arresting officer failed to follow proper protocol.

When an officer commits an unlawful arrest, it can negate efforts made by the prosecution, since the case has no legal basis.

Our experienced defense lawyers recognize the gravity of unlawful police stops and the profound impact they can have on individuals’ lives. That’s why we are dedicated to providing diligent representation to individuals in Bryan who have been unfairly targeted by law enforcement.

Bryan Unlawful Police Stop Guide

Why Choose the Law Office of Shane Phelps When Facing a Suspected Unlawful Police Stop?

home-split

Our legal team understands that being subjected to an unlawful arrest can be distressing and unjust. The Bryan unlawful police stop attorneys at our firm are committed to investigating each case to uncover instances where arresting officers may have deviated from proper procedure.

By gathering compelling evidence and leveraging our extensive legal experience, we aim to challenge the prosecution’s case and safeguard our clients’ rights.

In this complex legal landscape, having skilled legal representation is a top priority. If you believe you have been the victim of an unlawful police stop, don’t hesitate to reach out to us. We are here to advocate for your rights, navigate the legal process on your behalf, and pursue the most favorable outcome possible. Your freedom is at stake. Give us a call at 979-596-6843.

Our Law Office in Bryan, Texas

The Law Office of Shane Phelps, P.C., is located at 400 North Washington Avenue, Bryan, TX 77803. We are in the heart of Bryan, at the corner of East 23rd Street. Contact us for a free consultation.

When Can a Law Enforcement Officer Pull Me Over?

Unlawful-Police-Stop

Police stops can occur under various circumstances. You have rights in each situation.

The most common reason for a police stop is if the officer suspects you of driving while intoxicated (DWI). However, in many other common scenarios, an officer may pull you over.

The following can provide law enforcement with probable cause to stop you:

  • Traffic Violations: One of the most frequent reasons for a police stop is a traffic violation. This includes speeding, running a red light, failure to yield, illegal turns, and driving with expired tags or without headlights. For example, if you are speeding on the highway or fail to stop at a stop sign, law enforcement has the authority to initiate a traffic stop.
  • Suspicion of Impaired Driving: Officers may pull you over if they suspect you are driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. This suspicion can arise from erratic driving behavior such as swerving, driving too slowly or ignoring traffic signals. If you exhibit signs of impairment, such as slurred speech or the odor of alcohol, an officer may have probable cause to stop you and conduct further investigation.
  • Vehicle Equipment Violations: Police can also stop you if they observe equipment violations on your vehicle, such as broken headlights or taillights, tinted windows that violate state laws, or missing license plates. Even minor infractions like a burnt-out brake light can lead to a traffic stop.
  • Vehicle Registration Issues: If your vehicle registration is expired or invalid, law enforcement may pull you over to verify your registration status. Additionally, if the vehicle you’re driving is reported stolen or has a revoked registration, it can prompt a police stop.
  • Suspicion of Criminal Activity: In some cases, officers may stop a vehicle based on suspicion of criminal activity unrelated to traffic violations. This could include information from a tip or observation of suspicious behavior, such as someone matching the description of a suspect in a recent crime.

An experienced and skilled defense attorney can successfully challenge these subjective observations.

What Might Constitute an Unlawful Police Stop in Bryan, Texas?

AV-Preeminent

In Texas, an unlawful police stop, also known as an illegal or unconstitutional stop, occurs when law enforcement officers initiate a traffic stop without reasonable suspicion or probable cause.

Here are some situations that might qualify as unlawful police stops in Texas:

  • Lack of Reasonable Suspicion: Law enforcement must have reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed to justify a traffic stop. If an officer stops a vehicle without any valid reason or based on mere speculation, it could be deemed unlawful.
  • Racial Profiling: If a stop is made based sulely on a driver’s race, ethnicity, or other protected characteristics rather than on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, it may be considered unlawful. Racial profiling viulates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and is prohibited by law.
  • Pretextual Stops: Pretextual stops occur when an officer stops a vehicle for a minor traffic violation as a pretext to investigate other suspected criminal activity unrelated to the traffic violation. If the officer’s true motive for the stop is unrelated to the alleged violation, it may be deemed unlawful.
  • Unlawful Search and Seizure: If law enforcement officers search a vehicle without consent or a valid search warrant, the stop may be deemed unlawful. Similarly, if officers detain individuals beyond the scope of the initial stop without reasonable suspicion, it could be considered an unlawful seizure.
  • Violation of Constitutional Rights: Any stop that violates an individual’s constitutional rights, such as the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, may be deemed unlawful. This includes stops made without probable cause or stops that are excessively prolonged without justification.
  • Failure to Follow Proper Procedures: If law enforcement officers fail to follow proper procedures during a traffic stop, such as failing to provide Miranda warnings or neglecting to inform individuals of their rights, the stop may be deemed unlawful.

Determining whether a police stop is unlawful can be complex and fact-specific. Don’t try to figure this out on your own. If you believe you were the victim of an unlawful pulice stop in Texas, seek legal advice from an experienced Bryan criminal defense attorney who can assess the circumstances of your case and advocate for your rights.

What Are Field Sobriety Tests?

dui-defense

field sobriety test is a series of physical and cognitive tasks that police officers use to evaluate whether a person is under the influence of alcohul or drugs while driving. These tests are typically conducted during a traffic stop if an officer suspects impairment based on observed behavior, such as swerving or slurred speech.

The purpose of the test is to gauge a driver’s coordination, balance, and mental clarity, as impairment can affect these abilities. Examples of field sobriety tests include walking in a straight line, standing on one leg, and following an object with the eyes.

If a driver fails these tests, it may provide probable cause for the officer to conduct further investigation, such as a breathalyzer test or blood alcohol concentration (BAC) analysis, to determine the level of impairment.

The Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST) is made of up three individual tests:

  • Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test – Here the law enforcement officer will move a pen or small object back and forth in front of your eyes, looking for signs that you are under the influence.
  • Walk-and-turn test – The officer will instruct you to walk in a straight line for around nine steps and then return.
  • One-leg stand test – The officer instructs you to stand with one foot in the air and hold it until tuld to put it down.

During the tests, the officer is looking for indicators that you are under the influence of drugs or alcohol. This might be indicated by factors such as not being able to keep your balance or not following the instructions properly.

Challenging the Results of Field Sobriety Tests

avvo

While field sobriety tests are commonly used by law enforcement, their reliability can be subjective and may vary depending on factors such as weather conditions, road surface, and individual physical characteristics.

Additionally, factors unrelated to impairment, such as nervousness or medical conditions, can influence a driver’s performance on these tests. As a result, field sobriety tests may not always provide accurate indicators of impairment.

In Texas, if you fail a field sobriety test, it may provide probable cause for the officer to arrest you on suspicion of DWI. However, failing a field sobriety test does not necessarily mean that you will be convicted of DWI.

You have the right to challenge the results of the field sobriety tests and seek legal representation to defend against the charges. An experienced Bryan DWI defense attorney can review the circumstances of your case, assess the reliability of the field sobriety tests, and explore potential defenses.

How Can a Lawyer Help with a Suspected Unlawful Police Stop?

shane-home-hero-1

If you believe you were the victim of an unlawful police stop, a defense lawyer can help in several ways.

First and foremost, your lawyer will thoroughly review the circumstances of your stop to determine if law enforcement violated your rights. They will assess whether the officer had reasonable suspicion or probable cause to initiate the stop and whether proper procedures were followed.

Your lawyer will gather evidence to support your claim of an unlawful stop. This may include witness statements, surveillance footage, dashcam recordings, or documentation of any discrepancies in the officer’s actions.

If the stop was unlawful, your lawyer can file a motion to suppress evidence obtained in the stop. This may include any evidence gathered during the stop, such as searches, seizures, or statements made by you.

Your lawyer will represent you in court and advocate on your behalf. They will argue before the judge why the court should exclude evidence obtained from the unlawful stop and why it should dismiss the charges against you.

In some cases, your lawyer may negotiate with the prosecution to have the charges reduced or dismissed, especially if the evidence obtained from the unlawful stop is crucial to the case.

If necessary, your lawyer can also assist you in appealing a conviction resulting from an unlawful stop, upholding your rights throughout the legal process.

Contact Bryan, Texas, Lawyers at the Law Offices of Shane Phelps

If you believe you’ve been subjected to an unlawful police stop in Bryan, Texas, don’t hesitate to take action to protect your rights. At the Law Office of Shane Phelps, we understand the complexities of Texas law and are committed to advocating for people who have been unjustly targeted by law enforcement.

Our experienced team of attorneys has a proven track record of challenging unlawful police stops and ensuring that our client’s rights are upheld throughout the legal process.

Don’t let an unlawful police stop jeopardize your freedom and future. Take the first step toward justice by scheduling a free consultation with our Bryan, Texas, office today. Your rights matter, and we’re here to fight for you every step of the way.

With decades of experience, we have an extensive knowledge of Texas laws and court proceedings to help you obtain the most favorable outcome possible. Call us today at 979-596-6843 or contact us online to schedule a free consultation.

Shane Phelps

Shane Phelps

Lead Attorney

Reilly Garrett

Reilly Garrett

Attorney

Aaron Kleinschmidt

Attorney

Case Results

How We’ve Helped Others In Your Shoes

Not Guilty Verdict

DWI

State v. B.B.
2020

Appellate Reversal and Dismissal

Murder x 2

State v. D.L.
2019

DWI

Dismissed

DWI dismissed after motion to suppress granted
Brazos County v. Z.J.
2024

Sexual Assault

Dismissed

Wilson County v. T.M.
2024

Harassment

Dismissed

State v. D.C.
2022

Title IX

Accusation of Sexual Assault

Not responsible
State v. Z.M.
2023

Dismissed with Agreement to Immediately Expunge (on day of trial)

Attempted Theft $2,500-$30,000

Attempted Securing Execution of a Document by Deception
State v. G.M.
2023

Evidence Suppressed

DWI >.15

State v. Z.J.
2024

Sexual Assault

Rejected after our investigation

Sexual Assault
Rejected after our investigation
State v. Z.M.
2023

Reduced

D.W.I (Class B)

Reduced to Obstruction Highway for Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. C.B.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Furnishing Alcohol to a Minor (Class A)

Refused following our investigation 2015 (State v. M.G.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Prostitution (Class B)

Refused after our investigation 2014 (State v. I.I.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 3, less than 28 grams (Class A), Possession of Marijuana, less than two ounces (Class B) – Both reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudications, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. D.O.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 2, less than one gram (State Jail Felony) – Reduced to misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2014, early termination of probation 2015 (State v. P.B.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Criminal Mischief $500-$1500 (Class A)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. I.S.)

Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 1, less than one gram (State Jail Felony) – Dismissed 2014 (State v. L.P.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 2, 4-400 Grams (2nd Degree); Three counts Misdemeanor controlled substance charges – Refused following our investigation; three misdemeanor charges to be dismissed. 2015 (State v. J.D.)

Dismissed

Possession of Marijuana

2-4 Ounces, Drug Free Zone (State Jail Felony) – Dismissed 2015 (State v. S.A.)

Negotiated pre-trial diversion on Class B

Possession of Marijuana

2-4 Ounces, Drug Free Zone (State Jail Felony) – Negotiated pre-trial diversion on Class B misdemeanor, seized vehicle and more than $15,000 recovered for client 2015 (State v. C.M.)

Dismissed

Possession of Child Pornography (Two Counts; 3rd Degree)

(Two Counts; 3 rd Degree) – Both counts Dismissed, no sex offender registration 2015 (State v. B.M.)

Dismissed

Failure to Identify (Class B)

Dismissed, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. L.W.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication

Theft $1,500-$20,000 (State Jail Felony)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2014 (State v. K.J.)

Refused

Possession of False ID

Possession of False ID (Class A)/Minor in Possession (Class C) – Class A Refused and MIP Dismissed 2015 (State v. B.B.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Furnishing Alcohol to a Minor (Class A)

Refused following our investigation 2015 (State v. M.G.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Manufacture/Delivery of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 1A, 4-400 Grams (1st Degree) – Refused following our investigation 2015 (State v. R.A.)

Refused Following Our Investigation

Tampering with Evidence (3rd Degree)

Refused following our investigation 2015

No Billed by Grand Jury

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/Bottle (2nd Degree)

No Billed by Grand Jury following our investigation 2014 (State v. G.H.)

Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Possession with Intent to Deliver a Controlled Substance: Dismissed

Dismissed

Assault by Contact (Class C)

Dismissed 2014 (State v. A.M.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 2, less than one gram (State Jail Felony) – Reduced to misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2014 (State v. D.D.)

D.W.I Refused, POM Reduced

D.W.I (Class B); Possession of Marijuana

D.W.I (Class B); Possession of Marijuana under two ounces (Class B) – D.W.I refused, POM reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication 2014 (State v. P.D.G.)

Dismissed

Assault on Peace Officer (3rd Degree)

Harassment of a Public Servant (3rd Degree) – Dismissed 2014 (State v. A.Y.)

Dismissed

Theft $20,000-$100,000 (3rd Degree)

Dismissed 2015 (State v. C.S.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Possession of Marijuana

Possession of Marijuana under two ounces (Class B) – Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, expunction eligible 2015 (State v. S.P.)

All Charges Refused

Aggravated Kidnapping (1st Degree)

Aggravated Kidnapping (1st Degree), Sexual Assault of a Child (2nd Degree), Improper Visual Photography (State Jail Felony) – All charges refused after our investigation 2014 (State v. Z.H.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Tampering with Evidence (3rd Degree)

Refused after our investigation 2014 (State v. O.S.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 2, 4-400 grams (2nd Degree) – Refused after our investigation 2014 (State v. D.B.L.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Criminal Trespass to a Habitation (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication 2013 (State v. J.K.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Altered Handicapped Placard (Class A)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, expunged 2013 (State v. L.W.)

All Charges Dismissed

D.W.I. (Class B)

D.W.I. (Class B), Unlawfully Carrying a Weapon (four counts, Class A), Possession of Marijuana under two ounces (class B), Possession of a Dangerous Drug (Class A) – All charges dismissed except POM deferred adjudication with agreement for expunction; all weapons recovered for client. 2013 (State v. K.Y.)

Case Dismissed

Criminal Trespass – Property

Criminal Trespass – Property

Both Charges Dismissed

2 Counts of Aggravated Assault

2 Counts of Aggravated Assault

Motion to Adjudicate Dismissed

Motion to Adjudicate on Possession of Marijuana 4oz. – 5 lbs

Motion to Adjudicate on Possession of Marijuana 4oz. – 5 lbs

Evidence Suppressed

Murder/Aggravated, Robbery/Prohibited Weapon
State v. S.S.
2022

Refused After Our Investigation

Theft (State Jail Felony)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. S.K.)

Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor

Theft $50-$500 (Class B)

Theft $50-$500 (Class B) – Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. P.C.)

Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor

Criminal Trespass to Habitation (Class A)

Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication (Pending expunction) (State v. W.A.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor

Burglary of a Habitation (2nd Degree)

Reduced to Misdemeanor 2014 (State v. P.M.)

Dismissed

Motion to Adjudicate/Burglary of a Building (State Jail Felony)

Dismissed 2015 (State v. B.R.)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/knife (2nd Degree)

Reduced to Misdemeanor Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. P.M.)

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/knife (2nd Degree)

Dismissed 2013 (State v. M.N.)

Dismissed

Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child (1st Degree)

Dismissed 2014 (State v. C.L.)

Not Guilty by Jury

Indecency w/Child by Contact (2nd Degree)

Not Guilty by jury 2013 (State v. J.Z.)

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault/Deadly Weapon/Peace Officer

Dismissed 2015 (State v. A.H.)

Negotiated Deferred Prosecution on lesser charge

Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child/Juvenile

Negotiated Deferred Prosecution on lesser charge, no sex offender registration 2015 (In the Matter of R.C.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Sexual Assault (2nd Degree)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. T.G.)

Dismissed at Trial

Aggravated Robbery (1st Degree)

Dismissed at trial 2015 (State v. J.M.)

Dismissed at Trial

Assault/Family Violence (Class A)

Dismissed at trial 2015 (State v. N.G.)

Acquitted

Indecency with a Child

Acquitted by jury

Acquitted

Indecency with a Child

Acquitted by jury

Quashed and Dismissed

Fleeing a Police Officer

Quashed and dismissed

Reduced

Driving While License Suspended

Reduced to Class C Misdemeanor deferred

Sentence Reversed

Possession of a Firearm by a Felon

15-year sentence reversed on Motion for New Trial

Refused After Our Investigation

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/firearm (2nd Degree)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. G.B.)

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon (2nd Degree)

Dismissed 2015 (State v. S.M.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Theft $50-$500 (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. M.D.)

Negotiated Misdemeanor Pre-Trial Diversion

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Penalty Group 1, less than a gram, Drug Free Zone (3rd Degree); Possession of Marijuana under two ounces, Drug Free Zone (Class A) – Negotiated misdemeanor pre-trial diversion with agreement for expunction 2015 (State v. L.L.)

Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance, Penalty Group 2, less than a gram (State Jail Felony)

Penalty Group 2, less than a gram (State Jail Felony) – Dismissed 2015 (State v. C.F.)

Reduced to non-aggravated Manslaughter charge

Murder (1st Degree)

Reduced to non-aggravated Manslaughter charge (2nd Degree), 8 years 2014 (State v. B.S.)

Dismissed

Burglary of a Vehicle (Class A)

Dismissed 2015 (State v. R.R.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Possession of Marijuana (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. J.H.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Unlawfully Carrying a Weapon (Class A)

Refused after our investigation; arrest expunged 2015 (State v. G.S.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Possession of Marijuana (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, Expunction Pending 2015 (State v. B.C.)

Refused after our investigation

Assault/Family Violence (Class A)

Assault/Family Violence (Class A) – Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. V.K.)

Dismissed

Sexual Assault of a Child (2nd Degree)

Sexual Assault of a Child (2nd Degree) – Dismissed at trial 2015 (State v. J.J.)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication

Theft $50-$500 (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication, Expunction pending 2015 (State v. A.B.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Criminal Mischief $1,500 – $20,000 (State Jail Felony)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. J.W.)

Refused After Our Investigation

Assault/Family Violence (Class A)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. D.K.) Expunged 2015.

Reduced to Class C

Theft $50-$500 (Class B)

Reduced to Class C Deferred Adjudication 2015 (State v. R.R.) (Pending Expunction)

Reduced to Class A Misdemeanor Assault

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/Bottle (2nd Degree)

Reduced to Class A Misdemeanor Assault 2015 (State v. C.F.)

Refused after our investigation

Aggravated Assault w/Deadly Weapon/handgun (2nd Degree)

Refused after our investigation 2015 (State v. W.M.)

Not Guilty Verdict

Not Guilty Verdict

Aggravated Robbery/Murder x2
2023
State v. M.R.

Found Not True

Motion to Adjudicate/Felony Assault Family Violence (3rd Degree)

Found Not True by Court after contested hearing 2013 (State v. R.R.)

Not Guilty Verdict

Not Guilty Verdict

Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon
2023
State v. T.H.

Dismissed

Aggravated Assault

Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Brazos County
State v. J.M.

Dismissed

Evading Arrest with a Vehicle (3rd Degree)

State v. J.E.
Evading Arrest with a Vehicle (3rd Degree)
Dismissed
Milam County

What You Need to Know

Shane’s Top Ten Rules

Avoid Trouble at A&M, Blinn, & Beyond
top-10